The only thing to fear...

is the next Republican hostage...

or regular order.

10-8-13  Tuesday moUrning Quarter-Backing?
[Huff Po, Slate, The Hill, RSN] (oOps[!])

Please note, it is easier to see a mountain than find a mole.  But to cut the metaphors or morphed idioms, I hint at the progress/slippery slope, that is harder to undo than manifest*. Owe the Iron Knee  [ ! ] ?

*diplomacy

[Or pop U lace ? ]
Thumbs Up!
Government shutdown: Obama says he will negotiate when Republicans end 'threats'.
Speaking of Slippery Slopes...**
 

** links to borrowed image (see labels)

CAD (To be or not 3d)

Cause Affect Disorder* or Culturally Aided Design
[Objective / Subjective ?]

(counter point)

* Ted Nugent had a deficiency,
Romney's may be full blown disorder.

[Not to demonstrate the former...(see *)]
** yet to be linked/asterisked (see [**])
*** again who needs Republicans ?
[To cut through the CAD part...]

[**] Maybe the Title should read (3B or not 2D) As in three branches with discernible diplomacy?  Except for the disorder bit. Now that is survival*** of the asterisks.

[If President Obama were half of what is feared and smeared from the Right he would be more than then Left even hoped for, and even the middle might understand they are better off.  If he were the other half he would be just another empirical politician.  The point is that there is only so much that a President can do, to undo what previous administrations and congresses have undone.  Not to be a CAD, but computer aided discernment brings a hopeful and peaceful May Day?]

[Ryan Shrugged = more Mitt-Flop or disavowing the moral case for capitalism. Note on The Last Word. ^ Not to mention The Ed Show ?!?!]

^5-1-12
[Led Better Bill?]

P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)

Knot Even

A Case !*

I seemed to have been blogging in my sleep again.  In fact, I felt like I was even extending some unconscious blog or other draft work. Now, it was not my intent that 4 words(forwards?) be the case, but there was something about the self-reference("this sentence is false") being a bit ungrammatical.  I could just be me, but it is about self-reference, and dreams can undo that. OW, that was a role. But back from my Tan gent or Go sine.** (it seams) In order to be true or false would it not need another reference*** to be true or false? That is my case, and I will 4go any pun on M-beds in bed or post you lates or quad.

*search (six of one)
**(a bit anacronistic) at this point I note that "this sentence is" are actually 3 self references.
*** see 4D 'n perspective other ? ?

Bleep 'n Compromise (Dept Ceiling) Review**

Not to be prophetic, but "I told you so."

In particular in The Jig is Up? and Bleep 'n Compromise,
but more importantly under Respected Sources.

IMHO: Randi Rhodes and Lawrence O'Donnell are radio and TV's number one(respectively) explainers* of the Obama Administration. Here are two Debt Ceiling recaps from Randi Rhodes which are nothing compared to hearing her.(AM 1090 Forum )

*respectfully
** which is not the same as bleepin'
(See Bleep & Compromise)

[Related Links and Nets or Roots & branches.]
[I wish I could unembed a little more plain language from this post, but maybe a counter example might do. With a do nothing congress***, the best thing to do is to kick the can down the road for political purposes.

*** or more accurately an undo-everything-House
edited (bold and spacing only)

[On the other hand: No Labels(slash)New Party
More musing: architect, archetype / archespectral, archiflightese]
[Speaking of hooks or hoofs? Read Herring?]


John Deering

For Processing: Undo CU

Recalibrating Personhood over Citizens United!
Constitutional Amendment
Fact Sheet
More from Bernie Sanders.
Will any party jump on this? 

Tea Party Down Grade

and the Undo- Everything House of Reprehensibles
(Note the counter-linkage or weaving of sources.)

Reading of the Day and relevant fn.

One great thing about Obama's primary victory is now we know that's not true. This is the modern Republican Party. It turns out they were the ones who adopted Malcolm X's slogan, "By any means necessary." As disgusted as I am with S&P's decision to downgrade U.S. debt, the ratings agency took the unusual step of calling out the GOP in its press release, predicting future fiscal peril "because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues," Sen. John Kerry was right to call it the "Tea Party downgrade" on "Meet the Press" Sunday. They have now made clear they'll wreck the economy as long as they can wreck Obama's presidency. And we have no way to know that Clinton's history with right-wing saboteurs would have enabled her to fight more effectively.

Simpson-Bowles and S&P Re: Revenue.

Hennessey’s assessment of Simpson-Bowles is even more puzzling. As I’ve noted before, Simpson-Bowles raised about $2 trillion in new revenues and cut defense spending by about $800 billion. The plan Obama proposed to Boehner raises half as much revenue and, from what I’m told, includes about half as much in defense cuts. It’s hard to see how that qualifies as "to the left" of Simpson-Bowles.

The fn. above discusses a narrative that is lacking in Obama's rhetoric. The actual recalcitrance of the Republican party, the lack of a filibuster proof congress, not to mention the media as we know it(Koch Brothers), argues more balanced narrative than Blame Obama. The Obama Inaugural was our calling.
(NFRY)

Candidate Obama was nuanced and President Obama is pragmatic and incremental, the message is clear.
[Hoist on our own Picard.]
[More Meet the Press.]

Green Span on Degree of Certainty: the only thing certain is change, and that the Right won't.

I mean Greenspan: "this deficit problem that is out there is a lot larger than we calculated. the actual numbers employed by those calculating the deficits are based on a level of economic activity, which we are not acheiving." Rather than translate IMHO the Greenspan quote, there is FIXING NEWS(as opposed to breaking) as the President addresses the downgrade now. (Remarks by the President: and previous remarks)

Mitt Returns Wife's Gift

One might say it is politics,

but it is probably business.

But allow me an Etch-a-Sketch moment:

Ann Romney's gift was a re-gift of used analogy.

Ann claimed her gift from Hilary Rosen last week, but 3 months ago her husband used it up* on the campaign trail, when he claimed that stay-at-home moms lack "the dignity of work".

* Mitt would pay to deprive stay at home mom's this privilege.

[More on Romney "flexibility" versus President Obama's hot mic on Russia:

What I take away is that he will be a lot more "flexible" after they return to power. That way he won't have to oppose what Republicans have done to stand in the way of President Obama's plans for helping the country and the economy, not that they will not undo what he has done that has worked.

here.]

[The talk and what's up with Chris Hayes.]

[Speaking of flexibility.]

[RES PEC TRM-ONEY: I won't suggest the tune this be sung to.]

[Hide and Seek: Gaffers Tape and GOP Records.]

[Olly Olly Oxen Free: The Last Word ?]

Ear Rock, Ear Ron

Knee Cha [!]

Scissors

All In w/ Chris Hayes 
Obama on Hobby Lobby, Obama Cares and Don't"just say no". 
Bring it on, bring on a Bill.  Ironically, when it comes to the Affordable Care act, they claim he has exceeded his powers by making exemptions, when they want to undo the the whole act. 

Being a Blank "is Hard Work".

Meaning found in file folder:
Being a Heretic is Hard Work.
Or maybe it is the difference between being and getting 'er done.

[OWS verse the 1%?]
[Getting 'er* done?]


*apologies to*** whom[!]?

[Speaking** of Labels...U.N? Not to mention fair and balanced.]

** a, b, c, d (thin blue line ?) Or Re:U.N.

*** LOL: Laughter Occupy Lawyers (not to make light, but...)

[Note Labels U.N.(Unhate, Nuance), G'Ribble(or D'Ribble?)]
[Bottom line? See commenT and lede, and found'ers: Being a Blank "is Hard Work".]
[Super Stick: Debt Deal or Leverage: One thing about the Debt Ceiling deal and the Super Committee is that its failure is a not really that crucial. If it gets something done, the next congress can undo it. If it doesn't get anything done, the next congress will handle the cuts. Heck, I am not even certain it would be binding. Either way the next election will be telling. But anything balanced from the committee will not only be unlikely, but will not balance the history of Republican obstructionism since Obama game into office, nor balance the Republican debt.(See saw)]

Hoof and Mouth.

I don’t know if it is just me, but I don’t blame people if they think it is. I don’t want to beat a dead horse, but I didn’t shoot the facts in the hoof. Back to the issue that seems to be me, but it may just be that you had to be there: The Cheney Fox interview and the Kenedy County Sheriff’s Incident Report seem to deviate on the matter of spin. Was the quail flushed to the right or was it flying counter clockwise? I guess I had to be there. Either way, the accident is not what is being beat but the hoofing that was done to get it out.

On that trail, my earlier commentary on the spin:[2-17-06]

David Brooks, in his column Cheney hunting accident enters the spin-everything zone, makes a few good points but mainly is just another player in the spin zone. He refers to stereotypes and roles that the media will use and play, but which are spinning for one reason alone, the preemptive deviations of Cheney, so common in the administration.

Deviation from the process, more than preempts, but cuts out the roles of questioners who resort to stereotypes when the questions are not answered until the facts stop changing. What does the Vice President not having his press people have to do with the investigation waiting till the next day? Too much may be made of the press being slighted, the better to overlook that even "Voldemort" can’t turn back time and undo the spin resulting from the fear or at least delay in facing the truth.

In Brooks criticizing his own field, "Ours is not to feel or think. Ours is but to spin or die.", that seems to be what the administration would like us to do, and many have. This time, hopefully not Cheney‘s "friend".

And on the horizon, still beating

Your Darn?

You're Republican if you do, you're Republican if you don't.
The Obama cares of the Affordable Care Act. 
Re: Healthcare is a right, that must be paid for. 

Republicans want to undo the legislation without having their own plan.  It makes it easy for them to play the victim.  They can be against something that they were a part of but against all along.  It was concieved from the right and obstructed by the right. But dismantling it would be only a mess age. 

I know, the irony is too steep.  But progress really requires accountability, as Rush plays the victim of culture backlash. But not having a plan, and having nothing to be for but what was before. Their logic is wackamole(see O'Reilly/Bachman).  And Democrats have the accountablity of paying for what Republicans aren't able to take away.  In other words, it would be fine, if we could simply keep what
works without forcing it to be provided or determining who pays for it.  But that is actually the irony of their baselessness. 

Darn, I didn't. Original Post not posted March 21st, 2014.
P.S. Your Darn (STET)